Packaging · Make room for movement

Clear at rest.
Clear through the declared poses.

Nominal clearance was only the first check. The next rigid-wheel sweep found contact in eight of 24 poses on the earlier enclosed-duct body.

The motion-aware candidate enlarges the wheel houses around a conservative tyre-motion envelope and reroutes both ends of the ducts. Its front path moves inward by up to 100 mm; the rear moves by up to 90 mm. Section dimensions at the design stations are retained.

24 sampled poses. No contact.

The revised geometry clears ±85 mm vertical offsets and ±5° front steering at the sampled positions, with about 15 mm minimum clearance. All 12 sampled duct spans also remain enclosed and connected.

This is a rigid geometry requirement study. Actual suspension links, camber, toe, tyre growth, structural deflection and low-speed steering still need qualification. The earlier airflow calculation is not transferred to this new shape.

Keep the door zone.

The front reroute ends at 1.9 m; the rear reroute begins at 3.0 m. Neither changes the established 1.9–2.9 m door-opening region of the duct layout. The gullwing access study remains part of the vehicle; a full-size human-entry mock-up is still needed.

Door-zone geometry check ↗Existing door and access study ↗
Motion-aware engineering bodyReduced display mesh · no flow colours

Actual motion-aware engineering boundary, reduced for display. Route motion is schematic. Its complete flow-mesh gate is still under repair; this geometry has no airflow-force result yet and is not a structural chassis or the luxury publicity surface.

New pose results ↗Retained contact cases ↗Enclosed-passage check ↗Motion-envelope definition ↗